Often, these monitoring programs simply report what the chipset is seeing, as displayed in the BIOS Setup Menu under PC Health and not the device itself. The is not a clock, but a counterĪccurate reporting of temps, whether for the CPU, chipset/system, drives, GPU depends on the sensor, the motherboard/chipset, what exactly the monitoring program is looking at. Instead, it just counts the number of "cycles" (based on some "bus" frequency) that have passed and assigns a date and time to that number based on the last "Saved" setting in the CMOS modual BIOS Setup Menu. It does not keep track of days, years, hours, minutes, or seconds. It is similar to your system RTC (real time clock). That is how ALL temps in a computer are measured. That number is then translated into degrees by the monitoring/reporting program. The resulting voltage is then measured and then reported as "a number ". These sensors are NOT thermometers but diode devices that conduct or attenuate the flow of electrons through the diode in one direction, based on the temperature "felt" by the diode. NONE of these sensors read actual temps or measure in degrees. The processor is designed to throttle back when temperatures in the core exceed 65C, and there is a a safety offset in the equation, so monitoring the numerical "core temp" value would seem to have little practical benefit.Ĭlick to expand.Ummm, no, sorry. Because it does not get the benefit of the heat sink fan, it may read much hotter than the processor itself. On the other hand, the "cpu temp" value is a physical temperature from a sensor in the socket.
It is quite common for AMD idle temp values to be less than ambient. It cannot read idle temps or account for ambient temps correctly. The meat of it is that the AMD "core temp" is a calculated number using a proprietary equation on an arbitrary scale measured in degrees, not a physically measured temperature.ĪMD designed this equation to determine peak temp under heavy load, with an offset which equalizes at 45C. If you are interested, there is a long thread about idle temps on the FX 8350 dated Jan-Feb 2014 with information from overclockers and links to AMD sources. I would keep it in the case and look first to "cable management" to route and/or tie back cables to minimize impacting that desired front to back flow. If you remove the rack, then you have to find someplace to store it, in case you want to add a drive 2 years from now. At least with your temps, I sure would not worry about that. I don't think an "empty" HD rack will affect air flow in any significant manner.
What is speccy program windows#
I use CoreTemp for my real time - since you also live in the upside down part of the world and you are now in the middle of Winter, assuming you don't have windows open, your temps are excellent but not suspiciously so.
If they start getting close to 70° I go into panic mode, inspect to ensure all fans are still spinning and I then tear down my system to lug outside for blasting with my air compressor (the best way by far - with a suitable inline moisture and particulate filter, of course). In fact, my "reminder" that it is time to clean my dust/dog hair filters is when they touch and stay above 60° for more than a couple seconds. But that drops almost as quickly back to the mid 30s. My i7 with OEM cooling sits in mid 30s when loafing along but can almost instantly jump into the mid 50s when pushed, and actually hits about 62☌ for a couple seconds during boot when I load up a bunch of stuff.
I realize you live in the upside down part of the world, but is the room your computer sits in that cool? The Laws of Physics and thermodynamics just don't allow it. Click to expand.I am not sure I would trust that as 16° C = 60.8° F and it is a physical impossibility for conventional cooling (fans) to cool an object cooler than the ambient temperature of your room.
0 kommentar(er)
